CIC 822, 212 §3; CCEO 651, 15 §3: When Clerics and Bishops Clash over what Constitutes Appropriate Use of Social Media
Amplified in the world-wide COVID-19 pandemic, but already increasing year upon year, more and more attention by clergy is being marshalled to social media and blogging/Internet engagements. What canons and church teachings help us address growing disagreements between various clerics who are freely...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
2020
|
| Dans: |
Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions 2020
Année: 2020, Pages: 123-130 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 822
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 212
/ Numérisation
|
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
651 / codex canonum ecclesiarum orientalium
|
| Résumé: | Amplified in the world-wide COVID-19 pandemic, but already increasing year upon year, more and more attention by clergy is being marshalled to social media and blogging/Internet engagements. What canons and church teachings help us address growing disagreements between various clerics who are freely expressing their opinion on social media and web platforms vis-à-vis his Bishop’s role of vigilance? |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 1932208569 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions 2020
|