Baptism and Marriage in the Society of St. Pius X: Canon 11
A case has been referred to the tribunal concerning a couple who have presented themselves for the RCIA in one of our parishes. The man is a Mormon and not validly baptized, the woman was baptized by a priest of the Society of Saint P,ius X (SSPX). They were married in the SSPX church. We have two q...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2012
|
| Dans: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions ; 2012
Année: 2012, Pages: 67-68 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Baptême
/ Mariage
/ Mariage
/ Priesterbruderschaft St. Pius X.
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 11
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | SA Droit ecclésial SB Droit canonique |
| Résumé: | A case has been referred to the tribunal concerning a couple who have presented themselves for the RCIA in one of our parishes. The man is a Mormon and not validly baptized, the woman was baptized by a priest of the Society of Saint P,ius X (SSPX). They were married in the SSPX church. We have two questions. (1) Must she make a profession of faith, as do the Orthodox, when being received into full communion? (2) Is it correct to presume that their marriage was valid, in that neither party was a Catholic at the time of the marriage so they were not bound to the canonical form or impediments of the merely ecclesiastical law? |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 193220833X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions ; 2012
|