Baptism and Marriage in the Society of St. Pius X: Canon 11
A case has been referred to the tribunal concerning a couple who have presented themselves for the RCIA in one of our parishes. The man is a Mormon and not validly baptized, the woman was baptized by a priest of the Society of Saint P,ius X (SSPX). They were married in the SSPX church. We have two q...
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Print Tuhinga |
| Reo: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| I whakaputaina: |
2012
|
| In: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions ; 2012
Year: 2012, Pages: 67-68 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Taufe
/ Ehe
/ Eheschließung
/ Priesterbruderschaft St. Pius X.
/ Katholische Kirche, Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 11
|
| IxTheo Classification: | SA Church law; state-church law SB Catholic Church law |
| Whakarāpopototanga: | A case has been referred to the tribunal concerning a couple who have presented themselves for the RCIA in one of our parishes. The man is a Mormon and not validly baptized, the woman was baptized by a priest of the Society of Saint P,ius X (SSPX). They were married in the SSPX church. We have two questions. (1) Must she make a profession of faith, as do the Orthodox, when being received into full communion? (2) Is it correct to presume that their marriage was valid, in that neither party was a Catholic at the time of the marriage so they were not bound to the canonical form or impediments of the merely ecclesiastical law? |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 193220833X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions ; 2012
|