L' Affaire Ferréol : esclaustrazione e dimissione del religioso davanti al giudice francese; Tribunal judiciaire de Lorient - jugement du 29 novembre 2023 - Pres. Picard - S.D.L.V, Association syndicale C.D.S.E, M.O., M.D, J.C.N.; Tribunal judiciaire de Lorient - jugement du 3 avril 2024 - Pres. Picard - S.D.L.V, Association syndicale C.D.S.E, M.O., M.D, J.C.N$h
The Ferréol Affaire : Exclaustration and dismissal of a nun before a French judge · The paper illustrates the ruling of the Court of Lorient of 13 April 2024, which condemned a French religious institute, the apostolic commissioners and the Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation of Bishops to pay comp...
Subtitles: | Giurisprudenza - Religiosi |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | Italian |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2024
|
In: |
Il diritto ecclesiastico
Year: 2024, Volume: 135, Issue: 2, Pages: 639-684 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Exclaustration
/ Order
/ Dominican women's monastery
/ Institute of consecrated life
/ Dismissal
|
Further subjects: | B
Dismissial
B Canon and Civil Law B Institutes of Consecrated Life B Exclaustration |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The Ferréol Affaire : Exclaustration and dismissal of a nun before a French judge · The paper illustrates the ruling of the Court of Lorient of 13 April 2024, which condemned a French religious institute, the apostolic commissioners and the Cardinal Prefect of the Congregation of Bishops to pay compensation for the damages suffered by a nun, following her exclaustration and dismissal. We will then analyse the reasons for this ruling, also referring to the role the Court gave to the ecclesiastical authority’s failure to comply with canon law ; finally, a comparison will be made with the Italian experience. 1. Una premessa : la vicenda di Suor Ferréol. 2. I presupposti di diritto (civile e canonico) della decisione. 3. Le comuni ragioni di condanna dei convenuti. 3.1. I profili sostanziali. 3.2. … e quelli procedurali. 4. I profili di responsabilità contrattuale ed extracontrattuale. 5. Alcune considerazioni sulle rimostranze della Santa Sede, anche alla luce dell’esperienza italiana. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2035-3545 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Il diritto ecclesiastico
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.19272/202430802014 |