Sullo status dei nati da gestazione per altri all'estero : Nihil novi?: Riflessioni a margine di Cass., Sez. Un., 30 dicembre 2022, n. 38162
On the status of children born from surrogacy practices abroad. Nihil novi ? Remarks on Supreme Court 30th December 2022, no. 38162 · After recalling the main stages of the judicial debate on the status of the child born through surrogacy, the paper analyses and discusses the latest decision of Unit...
| Outros títulos: | Giurisprudenza : Gestazione per alteri |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Italiano |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2023
|
| Em: |
Il diritto ecclesiastico
Ano: 2023, Volume: 134, Número: 4, Páginas: 929-954 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Mãe de aluguel
/ Adoção
/ Tribunal supremo
/ Proteção da infância e juventude
/ Parentalidade
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | SB Direito canônico |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Child Status
B Public Order B Comentário B Surrogacy B Intended Parent |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | On the status of children born from surrogacy practices abroad. Nihil novi ? Remarks on Supreme Court 30th December 2022, no. 38162 · After recalling the main stages of the judicial debate on the status of the child born through surrogacy, the paper analyses and discusses the latest decision of United Sections no. 38162/2022. The essay points out that the Supreme Court’s proposed solution, which essentially confirms that of the United Sections no.12193/ 2019, raises a few questions that emerge in some key passages of the reasoning framework. In the opinion of the a., adoption in special cases (art. 44, para. 1, lett. d), l. n. 184/1983), even after the recent Constitutional Court decision no. 79/2022, is unable to ensure adequate protection of the child’s interest in full legal recognition of the relationship with the intentional-non-biological parent. 1. Il ‘diritto vivente’ rappresentato da Cass., Sez. Un., n. 12193 del 2019. 2. La decisione della Corte Costituzionale n. 33 del 2021. 3. L’ordinanza della Prima Sezione n. 1842 del 2022 e il supposto ‘vuoto normativo’. 4. Le Sezioni Unite tengono il punto… ma con un timido cambio di passo. 5. La persistente inadeguatezza dell’adozione in casi particolari. 6. Per una conclusione. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2035-3545 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Il diritto ecclesiastico
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.19272/202330804012 |