Response to Abusive Novice: Canons 642, 648 §2, 649 §1, and 653 §1
Our only novice started her canonical novitiate three months ago. Although she is a mature woman with good education and work experience, she is now exhibiting issues that did not surface in the admission process or in the prenovitiate stage. She is verbally abusive to the novice director. She refu...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2016
|
| Dans: |
Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions 2016
Année: 2016, Pages: 99-100 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Abus
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 642
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 648
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 649
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 653
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | SA Droit ecclésial SB Droit canonique |
| Résumé: | Our only novice started her canonical novitiate three months ago. Although she is a mature woman with good education and work experience, she is now exhibiting issues that did not surface in the admission process or in the prenovitiate stage. She is verbally abusive to the novice director. She refuses to open up and share during formation sessions, thus sabotaging the formation process. It seems to the general council that the canonical novitiate has been compromised. Short of dismissal, are there other ways that we might handle this abusive novice? |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 1932208445 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions 2016
|