Importancia de la función judicial en los actuales sistemas jurídicos: Situación en el derecho canónico

This article compares secular judicial law and canon judicial law on the basis of the distinction (present in both) between an ordinary situation and an emergency situation. This perspective enables an understanding of a "two-speed system" in canon law. Ordinary canonical justice has consi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Montini, G. Paolo (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Spanish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2024
In: Ius canonicum
Year: 2024, Volume: 64, Issue: 127, Pages: 163-190
Further subjects:B Estado de emergencia
B Procedimiento penal administrativo
B Potestad judicial
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article compares secular judicial law and canon judicial law on the basis of the distinction (present in both) between an ordinary situation and an emergency situation. This perspective enables an understanding of a "two-speed system" in canon law. Ordinary canonical justice has consistently and effectively asserted and continues to assert the independence of the judiciary, the quality of justice, as well as the efficiency of their processes. There is also canonical justice that is exercised largely by the executive authority; this is a consequence of a weakening of the sense of Church as society, in general, and because of the recent abuse scandals, in particular. Entrusting justice to the executive authority may be understood as a "state of emergency". However, the "justification" for this shift to executive authority requires three conditions, which are also encompassed by secular law: temporariness, proportionality, and suitability.
ISSN:2254-6219
Contains:Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.15581/016.127.012