Importancia de la función judicial en los actuales sistemas jurídicos: Situación en el derecho canónico
This article compares secular judicial law and canon judicial law on the basis of the distinction (present in both) between an ordinary situation and an emergency situation. This perspective enables an understanding of a "two-speed system" in canon law. Ordinary canonical justice has consi...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Spanisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| In: |
Ius canonicum
Jahr: 2024, Band: 64, Heft: 127, Seiten: 163-190 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Estado de emergencia
B Procedimiento penal administrativo B Potestad judicial |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article compares secular judicial law and canon judicial law on the basis of the distinction (present in both) between an ordinary situation and an emergency situation. This perspective enables an understanding of a "two-speed system" in canon law. Ordinary canonical justice has consistently and effectively asserted and continues to assert the independence of the judiciary, the quality of justice, as well as the efficiency of their processes. There is also canonical justice that is exercised largely by the executive authority; this is a consequence of a weakening of the sense of Church as society, in general, and because of the recent abuse scandals, in particular. Entrusting justice to the executive authority may be understood as a "state of emergency". However, the "justification" for this shift to executive authority requires three conditions, which are also encompassed by secular law: temporariness, proportionality, and suitability. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2254-6219 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15581/016.127.012 |