Ownership of Property, Competence of Holy See, Absolute Incompetence of Other Tribunals: Canons 1255; 1405; 1406; 1419
This case is interesting for several reasons: it involves a question of ownership of property in Australia, a complaint of nullity of sentence, and the question of which tribunal has competence to hear such casrs against a bishop or a diocese. The Rota's decree was sent to the CLSA for publicat...
| Collectivité auteur: | |
|---|---|
| Collaborateurs: | |
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2008
|
| Dans: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Année: 2008, Pages: 65-72 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 1255
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 1405
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 1406
/ Saint-Siège (motif), Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 1419
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | SA Droit ecclésial SB Droit canonique |
| Résumé: | This case is interesting for several reasons: it involves a question of ownership of property in Australia, a complaint of nullity of sentence, and the question of which tribunal has competence to hear such casrs against a bishop or a diocese. The Rota's decree was sent to the CLSA for publication in Roman Replies by the ponens Monsignor Kenneth E. Boccafola. The speficis have been altered. |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
|