La noción de derecho como presupuesto del diálogo interdisciplinar entre teólogos y canonistas
In order to show to what extent the notion of law is an indispensable basis for fruitful interdisciplinary dialogue between theologians and canonists, three models of understanding law in its application to canon law are presented here, drawn from texts by both theologians and canonists. These are t...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Español |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publicado: |
2022
|
En: |
Ius canonicum
Año: 2022, Volumen: 62, Número: 123, Páginas: 9-31 |
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Término jurídico
/ Canonística
/ Teología
/ Interdisciplinaridad
|
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | FA Teología SB Derecho canónico |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Teología
B Modelos de comprensión del derecho B Justicia en la Iglesia B Diálogo interdisciplinar B Derecho Canónico |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Sumario: | In order to show to what extent the notion of law is an indispensable basis for fruitful interdisciplinary dialogue between theologians and canonists, three models of understanding law in its application to canon law are presented here, drawn from texts by both theologians and canonists. These are the model of law yielded by the power of jurisdiction or as a discipline to be obeyed; the model of law as institution, order, structure or system; and the model of justice and the law as establishing what is just. Having acknowledged the legitimacy of these models, the advantages of the third model as the basis and driver of interdisciplinarity between theology and canon law are highlighted: justice and law must be of interest to theologians, and the mystery of the Church must be of interest to canonists. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2254-6219 |
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15581/016.123.017 |