The Eastern Code Turns Thirty: Finding Its Place in the One Corpus Iuris Canonici
Thirty years after the promulgation of the Eastern Code, canonical experts continue to define the interrelationship of the Eastern Code and the Latin Code together with Pastor bonus. Given CCEO canon 1 and the Holy See’s 2011 Explanatory Note regarding that canon as well as Pope Francis’ 2016 De con...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Institution of Oriental Canon Law
2020
|
In: |
Iustitia
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 35-67 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Catholic church, Verfasserschaft1, Codex canonum ecclesiarum orientalium
/ Corpus iuris canonici
/ Law
/ History
|
IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
Summary: | Thirty years after the promulgation of the Eastern Code, canonical experts continue to define the interrelationship of the Eastern Code and the Latin Code together with Pastor bonus. Given CCEO canon 1 and the Holy See’s 2011 Explanatory Note regarding that canon as well as Pope Francis’ 2016 De concordia inter Codices, this article examines two Eastern norms (cc. 678 §1 and 1102 §1) and their possible application to the Latin Church. The paper then deals with CCEO canon 193 §1 and the standard of care it establishes for a bishop entrusted with the care of faithful of another Church sui iuris. De concordia inter Codices has provided some clarity in the matter. Finally, the article examines the possibility of appeals from patriarchal tribunals to the Roman Rota. At issue is the significance of Eastern canon 1063 §3 in relation to PB art. 128, a question which still awaits a definitive response from the Holy See. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2248-9789 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Iustitia
|