Rendering unto Caesar in the Age of Revolution: William Sherlock and William of Orange
The events of 1688–9 forced English clergy to re-examine their understanding of the Divine Right of Kings. One solution was to distinguish between de facto and de iure kingship and maintain dual loyalty to James and William. Another involved shifting from ‘legitimist’ arguments towards a more immedi...
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Tāhiko Tuhinga |
| Reo: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | E uta ana...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| I whakaputaina: |
2008
|
| In: |
The journal of ecclesiastical history
Year: 2008, Huānga: 59, Tukunga: 4, Pages: 680-696 |
| Urunga tuihono: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Tāhiko
|
| Whakarāpopototanga: | The events of 1688–9 forced English clergy to re-examine their understanding of the Divine Right of Kings. One solution was to distinguish between de facto and de iure kingship and maintain dual loyalty to James and William. Another involved shifting from ‘legitimist’ arguments towards a more immediate view of Providence. William Sherlock expounded both positions between 1689 and 1690. This article uses under-utilised manuscripts to show how, why and when his thought moved away from de iure and towards de facto expressions of Divine Right and hence became a cause célèbre for the Orange regime and a nightmare for the non-jurors. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-7637 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of ecclesiastical history
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0022046908005903 |