Radical sanation of a marriage: Canons 1161-1165
Recently I attended the wedding of a cousin that was co-officiated by a priest ( not myself) and a rabbi. The wedding took place at a banquet facility quite distant from the parish my cousin attends. The priest accepted the couple's vows. The priest was not from the diocese where the wedding to...
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Print Tuhinga |
| Reo: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| I whakaputaina: |
2006
|
| In: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Year: 2001, Huānga: 3, Pages: 312-315 |
| IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law |
| Further subjects: | B
Katholische Kirche Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1161-1165
B Eherecht B Verschiedenheit B Religion B Sanatio in radice |
| Whakarāpopototanga: | Recently I attended the wedding of a cousin that was co-officiated by a priest ( not myself) and a rabbi. The wedding took place at a banquet facility quite distant from the parish my cousin attends. The priest accepted the couple's vows. The priest was not from the diocese where the wedding took place. Upon further inquiry, it came to my attention that the priest is not one to concern himself overmuch about the niceties and necessities of canon law. I am seeking the wise canonical counsel as to the best way in which I should proceed. It is my suspicion that no dispensations were granted. I wish neither to embarrass the priest nor to disturb my cousin and her new husband. Would it be possible for me to inquire of the chancellor of the diocese where the wedding took place as to whether any dispensations had been granted. If none were, would I be able to request a sanatio in radice on behalf of the couple and see that the appropriate notations were made? |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
|