Radical sanation of a marriage: Canons 1161-1165

Recently I attended the wedding of a cousin that was co-officiated by a priest ( not myself) and a rabbi. The wedding took place at a banquet facility quite distant from the parish my cousin attends. The priest accepted the couple's vows. The priest was not from the diocese where the wedding to...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Главный автор: Mendonça, Augustine 1941- (Автор)
Формат: Print Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Опубликовано: 2006
В: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Год: 2001, Том: 3, Страницы: 312-315
Индексация IxTheo:SB Каноническое право
Другие ключевые слова:B Брачное право
B Религия (мотив)
B Католическая церковь (мотив) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1161-1165
B Различие (мотив)
B Sanatio in radice
Описание
Итог:Recently I attended the wedding of a cousin that was co-officiated by a priest ( not myself) and a rabbi. The wedding took place at a banquet facility quite distant from the parish my cousin attends. The priest accepted the couple's vows. The priest was not from the diocese where the wedding took place. Upon further inquiry, it came to my attention that the priest is not one to concern himself overmuch about the niceties and necessities of canon law. I am seeking the wise canonical counsel as to the best way in which I should proceed. It is my suspicion that no dispensations were granted. I wish neither to embarrass the priest nor to disturb my cousin and her new husband. Would it be possible for me to inquire of the chancellor of the diocese where the wedding took place as to whether any dispensations had been granted. If none were, would I be able to request a sanatio in radice on behalf of the couple and see that the appropriate notations were made?
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions