Validity of ordination questioned: Canon 10
At a recent ordination of a deacon, the bishop inadvertently neglected to impose hands on the candidate until after he had said the prayer of ordination. Afterwards, the deacon questioned whether he was validly ordained. The bishop, to remove all doubts, conditionally ordained him privately by impos...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Print Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2006
|
| Em: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Ano: 2002, Volume: 3, Páginas: 6-7 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | SB Direito canônico |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Igreja católica Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 10
B Validade B Consagração B Diácono B Sakramentenrecht |
| Resumo: | At a recent ordination of a deacon, the bishop inadvertently neglected to impose hands on the candidate until after he had said the prayer of ordination. Afterwards, the deacon questioned whether he was validly ordained. The bishop, to remove all doubts, conditionally ordained him privately by imposing hands and saying the prayer of ordination again. Is it necessary, for validity, that the imposition of hands precede the prayer of ordination? If so, did the bishop validly ordain by the imposition of hands and prayer of ordination alone, without observing anything else in the rite? |
|---|---|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
|