The Ideal Of Accessible Justice: In Praise Of Jurisprudence
This article looks at problems in canonical penal processes raised by the lack of accessible jurisprudence in the form of written reasons for decision from prior cases and the effect this has on victims and the right of accused to mount a defence. The article suggests how the approach of civil cour...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Gregorian & Biblical Press
2020
|
| In: |
Periodica de re canonica
Year: 2020, Volume: 109, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 633-658 |
| Further subjects: | B
Jurisdiction
B Canon law B Anonymity B Criminal law B Defense |
| Summary: | This article looks at problems in canonical penal processes raised by the lack of accessible jurisprudence in the form of written reasons for decision from prior cases and the effect this has on victims and the right of accused to mount a defence. The article suggests how the approach of civil courts in publishing written reasons where confidentiality has to be maintained might be utilised by canonical tribunals in dealing similar issues. L'ideale della giustizia accessibile: in lode della giurisprudenza. Questo articolo esamina problemi nei processi penali canonici sollevati dalla mancanza di una giurisprudenza accessibile sotto forma di ragioni scritte per la decisione da casi precedenti e l’effetto che ciò ha sulle vittime e il diritto degli accusati di montare una difesa. L’articolo suggerisce come l’approccio dei tribunali civili nella pubblicazione di motivi scritti in cui la riservatezza deve essere mantenuta possa essere utilizzato dai tribunali canonici nel trattare questioni simili. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2610-9212 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Periodica de re canonica
|