Der Tod Christi als Sühnopfer - Probleme und gegenwärtige Antworten der Forschung
Summary Beginning with the observation that the salvific nature of Jesus’ death is frequently rejected as a starting point in theology, this article (1) recalls some often forgotten analytical distinctions and (2) analyses the contemporary soteriological positions of René Girard, Sarah Coakley, Mari...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[2016]
|
| In: |
Kerygma und Dogma
Year: 2016, Volume: 62, Issue: 2, Pages: 135-159 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jesus Christus
/ Death
/ Sacrifice (Religion)
/ Atonement
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBF Christology NBK Soteriology SB Catholic Church law |
| Further subjects: | B
Christology
B Grace B Sin B Anthropology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Summary Beginning with the observation that the salvific nature of Jesus’ death is frequently rejected as a starting point in theology, this article (1) recalls some often forgotten analytical distinctions and (2) analyses the contemporary soteriological positions of René Girard, Sarah Coakley, Marit Trelstad, Jan-Olav Henriksen, and the author himself.The concluding constructive section sketches a soteriological position based on a narrative ontology in which Jesus’ death is embedded in broader stories of the Son and Trinitarian salvation history, which at the same time also form the canon of human becoming. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Vorgetragen bei der Tagung des Theologischen Konvents Augsburgischen Bekenntnisses (TKAB) im Jahr 2015 zum Thema "Wer ist Jesus Christus für uns heute?" |
| ISSN: | 0023-0707 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2016.62.2.135 |