Slavery and Liberty: Talmud and Political Theory in Dialogue
While focusing on the concept of liberty, this article produces a dialogue between the Talmud and western political theory, and thus expands the canon of political thought. Equipped with three concepts of liberty - negative, positive, and republican - this article offers an original reading to Bab...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Publié: |
[2018]
|
Dans: |
Harvard theological review
Année: 2018, Volume: 111, Numéro: 2, Pages: 147-173 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Talmud
/ Berlin, Isaiah 1909-1997
/ Liberté
/ Esclavage
|
Classifications IxTheo: | BH Judaïsme NBE Anthropologie NCB Éthique individuelle |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Édition parallèle: | Non-électronique
|
Résumé: | While focusing on the concept of liberty, this article produces a dialogue between the Talmud and western political theory, and thus expands the canon of political thought. Equipped with three concepts of liberty - negative, positive, and republican - this article offers an original reading to Babylonian Talmud Giṭ 12a-13a. The talmudic passage's pivotal question - whether liberty is necessarily beneficial to a slave - enables us to reconstruct its fundamental, albeit implicit, understandings of both slavery and liberty. The talmudic approach to slavery and liberty emerges as concrete, and hence yields a thick and multi-faceted notion of liberty. Considering that a person might prefer the benefits of slavery reveals a paradox in Isaiah Berlin's negative concept of liberty. Therefore, as this article concludes, his conceptual distinction between two concepts of liberty is unsustainable and needs to be replaced by a concrete and thick notion of liberty. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1475-4517 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Harvard theological review
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0017816018000032 |