Human rights and religions: living together' or dying apart? A critical assessment of the dissenting opinion in S.A.S. v. France and the notion of living together'
As universalism and pluralism collide when law and religion meet, is freedom of religion balanced between the universality of human rights and the religious particularities of states? To reach an answer, a thorough analysis of the ECtHR judgement S.A.S. v. France is presented, including the joint pa...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Pubblicazione: |
[2017]
|
In: |
Religion, state & society
Anno: 2017, Volume: 45, Fascicolo: 3/4, Pagine: 203-215 |
(sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
/ Diritti umani <motivo>
/ Comunità
/ Libertà di religione
|
Altre parole chiave: | B
burqa
B international and comparative law B Diversity B European consensus B Freedom Of Religion B S.A.S B living together |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Riepilogo: | As universalism and pluralism collide when law and religion meet, is freedom of religion balanced between the universality of human rights and the religious particularities of states? To reach an answer, a thorough analysis of the ECtHR judgement S.A.S. v. France is presented, including the joint partly dissenting opinion of Judges Nussberger and Jäderblom. I focus on the notion of living together' when interpreting the majority and dissenting opinions in accordance with the nexus of human rights and religions. A second aim focuses on the use of comparative and international law in clarifying the notion of European consensus, and the way this argument is reflected in case-law and legal reasoning in one of the most discussed and controversial decisions of the ECtHR. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1465-3974 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Religion, state & society
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2017.1390854 |