The European Court of Human Rights and the myth of freedom of religion
The European Court of Human Rights (ecthr) plays a vital role in safeguarding religious freedom amid rising extremism and intolerance in Europe. This article argues that the Court acts not only as a legal body but also as a cultural mediator, shaping a pluralistic ethos through its jurisprudence. Us...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2024
|
| В: |
Il diritto ecclesiastico
Год: 2024, Том: 135, Выпуск: 3/4, Страницы: 755-771 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Pluralism
B echr B Neutrality B Freedom Of Religion B Mythologies B ecthr |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | The European Court of Human Rights (ecthr) plays a vital role in safeguarding religious freedom amid rising extremism and intolerance in Europe. This article argues that the Court acts not only as a legal body but also as a cultural mediator, shaping a pluralistic ethos through its jurisprudence. Using Roland Barthes’ concept of myth, the article explores how ecthr case-law reflects Europe’s historical, social, and political narratives, balancing universal rights with national traditions. The Court has moved from prioritizing dominant cultural paradigms to embracing multiculturalism, promoting a pluralistic model that integrates diverse beliefs while rejecting rigid neutrality. Interpreting Article 9 inclusively, the ecthr protects cultural diversity, combats fundamentalism, and promotes a European pluralism rooted in mutual respect, integration, and the shared principles of the European Convention on Human Rights. 1. Introduction. 2. Freedom of Religion as a Myth. 3. The Margin of Appreciation in the application of the Right to Freedom of Religion. 4. Spirituality, Secularism and the quest for a Common Paradigm. 5. Concluding Remarks. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2035-3545 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Il diritto ecclesiastico
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.19272/202430804005 |