Canon 291 and the 1980 Normae Procedurales, Art. 4: Suspensio ad cautelam for Priests Requesting "Laicization"
When a priest petitions to be dispensed from the obligation of celibacy (c.291), is a diocesan bishop or major superior of a clerical institute of pontifical right still obliged to impose the suspensio ad cautelam (Normae, art. 4)? If so, does this suspension have the nature of a penalty?
Kaituhi matua: | |
---|---|
Hōputu: | Print Tuhinga |
Reo: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
I whakaputaina: |
2020
|
In: |
Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions 2020
Year: 2020, Pages: 105-109 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Katholische Kirche, Verfasserschaft1, Codex iuris canonici (1983). 291
/ Laisierung
|
Whakarāpopototanga: | When a priest petitions to be dispensed from the obligation of celibacy (c.291), is a diocesan bishop or major superior of a clerical institute of pontifical right still obliged to impose the suspensio ad cautelam (Normae, art. 4)? If so, does this suspension have the nature of a penalty? |
---|---|
ISBN: | 1932208569 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Roman Replies and CLSA Advisory Opinions 2020
|