Passive Proselytism: The European Court of Human Rights and Religious Garments
Abstract Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to freedom of religion and conscience. The language of Article 9(1) has been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights as including protections for acts of proselytism, when properly committed and respectful of...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
2021
|
| Em: |
Journal of law, religion and state
Ano: 2021, Volume: 9, Número: 2/3, Páginas: 244-269 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950-11-04), Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4)
/ Liberdade de religião
/ Conversão (Religião)
/ Interdição
/ Religião
/ Roupa
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AD Sociologia da religião AG Vida religiosa XA Direito ZC Política geral |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
religious garments
B Article 9 B Proselytism B Religious Freedom B European Court of Human Rights B European Convention on Human Rights |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | Abstract Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to freedom of religion and conscience. The language of Article 9(1) has been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights as including protections for acts of proselytism, when properly committed and respectful of the rights and freedoms of others. This was the view taken in the foundational Article 9 case of the Court, Kokkinakis v. Greece. In the decades since Kokkinakis, however, the view of the Court on proselytism appears to have shifted, in particular in Article 9 cases involving religious garments. This article seeks to determine whether the Court is consistent in its views on proselytism between these religious garment cases and earlier examples of Article 9 case law. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2212-4810 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal of law, religion and state
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22124810-2021J005 |