Passive Proselytism: The European Court of Human Rights and Religious Garments

Abstract Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to freedom of religion and conscience. The language of Article 9(1) has been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights as including protections for acts of proselytism, when properly committed and respectful of...

Πλήρης περιγραφή

Αποθηκεύτηκε σε:  
Λεπτομέρειες βιβλιογραφικής εγγραφής
Κύριος συγγραφέας: Carpenter, Christine (Συγγραφέας)
Τύπος μέσου: Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο
Γλώσσα:Αγγλικά
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Φόρτωση...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Έκδοση: 2021
Στο/Στη: Journal of law, religion and state
Έτος: 2021, Τόμος: 9, Τεύχος: 2/3, Σελίδες: 244-269
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών:B Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950-11-04), Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention (1950 November 4) / Θρησκευτική ελευθερία / Αλλαγή θρησκεύματος (θρησκεία, μοτίβο) (Θρησκεία) / Απαγόρευση / Θρησκεία / Ενδύματα <μοτίβο>
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo:AD Κοινωνιολογία της θρησκείας, Πολιτική της θρησκείας
AG Θρησκευτική ζωή, Υλική θρησκεία
ΧΑ Δίκαιο
ZC Πολιτική
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά:B religious garments
B Article 9
B Proselytism
B Religious Freedom
B European Court of Human Rights
B European Convention on Human Rights
Διαθέσιμο Online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Περιγραφή
Σύνοψη:Abstract Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights protects the right to freedom of religion and conscience. The language of Article 9(1) has been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights as including protections for acts of proselytism, when properly committed and respectful of the rights and freedoms of others. This was the view taken in the foundational Article 9 case of the Court, Kokkinakis v. Greece. In the decades since Kokkinakis, however, the view of the Court on proselytism appears to have shifted, in particular in Article 9 cases involving religious garments. This article seeks to determine whether the Court is consistent in its views on proselytism between these religious garment cases and earlier examples of Article 9 case law.
ISSN:2212-4810
Περιλαμβάνει:Enthalten in: Journal of law, religion and state
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22124810-2021J005