Requests for dispensation of a ratum et non consummatum marriage: Canons 1061; 1681; 1704 §1
"In a memorandum to the US. Bishops dated August 3, 2009, Cardinal Francis George, O.Ml., President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, forwarded a request from his Eminence Cardinal Antonio Canizares Llovera, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of...
| Collectivité auteur: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publié: |
2009
|
| Dans: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Année: 2009, Pages: 29-31 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | SB Droit canonique |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Saint-Siège (motif) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1061
B Droit matrimonial B Saint-Siège (motif) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1681 B Saint-Siège (motif) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1704, §1 B Nichtvollzugsverfahren |
| Résumé: | "In a memorandum to the US. Bishops dated August 3, 2009, Cardinal Francis George, O.Ml., President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, forwarded a request from his Eminence Cardinal Antonio Canizares Llovera, Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, dated June 13, 2009 (Port. N. 551/09M), that the Congregation's December 20, 1986 procedures be disseminated to those competent in such matters. An English translation of the 1986 procedures can be found in Canon Law Digest Vol. 13, pages 695-701. The Congregation expressed concern that some tribunal officials, viewing the ratum process as highly specialized and complex, may be hesitant to utilize it, even in appropriate cases. To assist with the local instruction of such cases and the preparation. Of the necessary acta for submission to the Holy See, the Congregation also provided a helpful Pro Memoria." |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
|