Catholic form of marriage and formal act of defection: Canon 1127
Mary was baptized a Latin (Roman) Catholic. Her father is a Latin Catholic and her mother is a Greek Orthodox. Mary was educated and raised in the Catholic faith. Prior to her marriage in 1990 she formally converted to the Greek Orthodox faith, in which she continues to worship. She subsequently mar...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Εκτύπωση Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Έκδοση: |
2006
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
Έτος: 2001, Τόμος: 3, Σελίδες: 304-307 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Δίκαιο του γάμου
B Σύναψη γάμου (μοτίβο) B Καθολική Εκκλησία (μοτίβο) Codex iuris canonici 1983. can. 1127 B Αποχώρηση από την Εκκλησία B Formpflicht B actus formalis |
| Σύνοψη: | Mary was baptized a Latin (Roman) Catholic. Her father is a Latin Catholic and her mother is a Greek Orthodox. Mary was educated and raised in the Catholic faith. Prior to her marriage in 1990 she formally converted to the Greek Orthodox faith, in which she continues to worship. She subsequently married a Latin Catholic man in the Greek Orthodox Church. No dispensations for the marriage had been sought from or granted by the Catholic Church. In view of canon I 127, is Mary considered to be Greek Orthodox and thus, is her marriage to this Catholic man valid, though illicit? Or is Mary still considered to be Catholic, and thus not able to marry validly a Catholic in the Greek Orthodox Church? Since the marriage has failed, would it be processed by the tribunal as a formal annulment or as a simple lack of canonical form case? |
|---|---|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Roman replies and CLSA advisory opinions
|