Is Religious Intolerance Good for Your Health?: Reflections on Korea and covid-19
Abstract Legal responses to the covid -19 pandemic have varied widely. Korea represents an interesting case study, as it seemed particularly well prepared, having enacted legislation in the wake of the mers outbreak, in 2015, to tackle future pandemics. This obviated recourse to emergency powers leg...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Caricamento...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Pubblicazione: |
2020
|
| In: |
Journal of law, religion and state
Anno: 2020, Volume: 8, Fascicolo: 2/3, Pagine: 201-227 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Korea
/ Stato
/ COVID-19
/ Pandemia
/ Infezione
/ Magia di protezione
/ Nuove religioni
/ Intolleranza
/ Libertà di religione
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AB Filosofia delle religioni AD Sociologia delle religioni AZ Nuove religioni KBM Asia KDH Movimenti religiosi cristiani XA Diritto ZC Politica generale |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
International Law
B Proportionality B Covid-19 B non-discrimination B Human Rights B emergency powers B Korea |
| Accesso online: |
Accesso probabilmente gratuito Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (Verlag) |
| Riepilogo: | Abstract Legal responses to the covid -19 pandemic have varied widely. Korea represents an interesting case study, as it seemed particularly well prepared, having enacted legislation in the wake of the mers outbreak, in 2015, to tackle future pandemics. This obviated recourse to emergency powers legislation, and couched Korea’s response in normal legislation, which tends to raise fewer human rights concerns than may arise under emergency measures. Despite this, however, Korea’s response to covid -19 raises significant questions about its compliance with core human rights norms under the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, including freedom of religion and non-discrimination. These arose with regard to the state’s treatmennt of members of the Shincheonji Church of Jesus ( scj ), a relatively small, occasionally controversial, religious group. The treatment of the scj by the Korean state raises questions about whether its legal approach to tackling covid -19 was fit for purpose. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2212-4810 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Journal of law, religion and state
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/22124810-2020012 |