Plague, Practice, and Prescriptive Text: Jewish Traditions on Fleeing Afflicted Cities in Early Modern Ashkenaz

Abstract This article studies the fate of a contradiction between practice and prescriptive text in 16th-century Ashkenaz. The practice was fleeing a plagued city, which contradicted a Talmudic passage requiring self-isolation at home when plague strikes. The emergence of this contradiction as a hal...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Chechik, Moshe Dovid (Autore)
Altri autori: Morsel-Eisenberg, Tamara
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: 2020
In: Journal of law, religion and state
Anno: 2020, Volume: 8, Fascicolo: 2/3, Pagine: 152-178
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Talmud / Peste / Quarantena / Fuga / Aschenaziti / Halakhah
Notazioni IxTheo:AD Sociologia delle religioni
BH Ebraismo
TJ Età moderna
ZA Scienze sociali
Altre parole chiave:B Plague
B Early Modern
B Jewish Law
Accesso online: Accesso probabilmente gratuito
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Verlag)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:Abstract This article studies the fate of a contradiction between practice and prescriptive text in 16th-century Ashkenaz. The practice was fleeing a plagued city, which contradicted a Talmudic passage requiring self-isolation at home when plague strikes. The emergence of this contradiction as a halakhic problem and its various forms of resolution are analyzed as a case study for the development of halakhic literature in early modern Ashkenaz. The Talmudic text was not considered a challenge to the accepted practice prior to the early modern period. The conflict between practice and Talmud gradually emerged as a halakhic problem in 15th-century rabbinic sources. These sources mixed legal and non-legal material, leaving the status of this contradiction ambiguous. The 16th century saw a variety of solutions to the problem in different halakhic writings, each with their own dynamics, type of authority, possibilities, and limitations. This variety reflects the crystallization of separate genres of halakhic literature.
ISSN:2212-4810
Comprende:Enthalten in: Journal of law, religion and state
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22124810-2020014