Citing Sarah in the New Testament and Rabbinic Literature: Does Original Context Matter?

This article treats the reference to the Jewish matriarch Sarah in 1 Pet 3,5-6, long a crux interpretum in NT studies, as a test case in the larger methodological question of interpreting ancient writers’ uses of biblical verses. Whereas some biblical scholars assert that we cannot understand a quot...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Bar Asher Sigal, Mikhal 1979- (Autore)
Altri autori: Dinkler, Michal Beth 1979-
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: [2020]
In: Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses
Anno: 2020, Volume: 96, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 443-457
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Sara, Personaggio biblico / Letteratura rabbinica / Interpretazione
Notazioni IxTheo:HB Antico Testamento
HC Nuovo Testamento
HD Medio-giudaismo
Accesso online: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:This article treats the reference to the Jewish matriarch Sarah in 1 Pet 3,5-6, long a crux interpretum in NT studies, as a test case in the larger methodological question of interpreting ancient writers’ uses of biblical verses. Whereas some biblical scholars assert that we cannot understand a quotation or allusion in a biblical text unless we also consider its original context, others insist that the original context of a received text is irrelevant because ancient Jewish biblical interpreters regularly took small textual details as launching points for wholly new interpretations. We want to challenge both sides of this methodological debate. Biblical scholars err when representing this issue in an 'all or nothing' fashion, as though one particular interpretive strategy (decontextualizing or evoking context) could ever typify one particular tradition (Jewish or Christian). We show that rabbinic interpreters and writers of New Testament texts employ various reading practices, drawing on or disregarding original contexts according to which strategy will be most rhetorically efficacious in a given moment. A comparative look at such questions not only allows for better and more nuanced understandings of each source individually, but can also help trace the trajectories of certain interpretive readings in the different communities of Late Antiquity.
ISSN:1783-1423
Comprende:Enthalten in: Ephemerides theologicae Lovanienses
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/ETL.96.3.3288585