What Evicting Grizzly Bear Spirit Does (and Doesn't) Tell Us about Indigenous "Religion" and Indigenous Rights
The Canadian Supreme Court's (2017) decision in Ktunaxa First Nation v. British Columbia is instructive because it demonstrates the continuing incompatibility of what religion "means" in the Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities, respectively. There are, however, additional lesson...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Studies in religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 49, Issue: 1, Pages: 32-49 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Canada, Supreme Court
/ Kutenai
/ Religion
/ British Columbia
/ Religious freedom
/ Minority rights
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy BB Indigenous religions KBQ North America XA Law |
| Further subjects: | B
Indigenous Religion
B Ktunaxa B modèles de religions B Canadian Supreme Court B religion autochtone B Indigenous rights B droits des autochtones B Cour suprême du Canada B models of religion |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1692423460 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240409123442.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200313s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0008429819854357 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1692423460 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1692423460 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)135807867 |0 (DE-627)571668844 |0 (DE-576)165250755 |4 aut |a Carroll, Michael P. |d 1944- | |
| 109 | |a Carroll, Michael P. 1944- |a Carroll, Michael 1944- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What Evicting Grizzly Bear Spirit Does (and Doesn't) Tell Us about Indigenous "Religion" and Indigenous Rights |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The Canadian Supreme Court's (2017) decision in Ktunaxa First Nation v. British Columbia is instructive because it demonstrates the continuing incompatibility of what religion "means" in the Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities, respectively. There are, however, additional lessons to be learned by looking carefully at an aspect of this case that troubled many non-Indigenous commentators, namely, that much of the Ktunaxa claim seemed to rest upon an "epiphany" experienced by a single Ktunaxa elder. What can be detected in the documentary record about that epiphany is evidence of a gradual process by which better understandings of the world are brought into being under the influence of a "web of interconnections" understanding of the world. Recognizing that this process is operative in Indigenous communities has implications not just for the study of Indigenous religion, but also for the way Courts (using their own criteria) might "think about" Indigenous rights. | ||
| 520 | |a La décision de la Cour suprême du Canada (2017) dans Ktunaxa Nation c. Colombie Britannique est instructive puisqu'elle démontre l'incompatibilité chronique de ce que la religion « signifie » respectivement pour les communautés autochtones et non-autochtones. Toutefois, d'autres leçons sont à tirer en observant attentivement un aspect de cette affaire qui troubla de nombreux commentateurs. À savoir, qu'une partie majeure de la requête émanant de la nation Ktunaxa semble reposer uniquement sur une « épiphanie » vécue par un seul aîné Ktunaxa. À partir des traces documentant l'épiphanie, il est possible de déceler les preuves d'un processus graduel donnant naissance à de meilleures compréhensions du monde sous l'influence d'une conception basée sur un modèle de « réseau d'interconnections ». La reconnaissance du fait que ce processus est clé pour les communautés autochtones a des implications non seulement sur l'étude des religions autochtones, mais également sur la manière dont les tribunaux (selon leurs propres critères) « pensent » aux droits des autochtones. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Canadian Supreme Court | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cour suprême du Canada | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Indigenous Religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Indigenous rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ktunaxa | |
| 650 | 4 | |a droits des autochtones | |
| 650 | 4 | |a models of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a modèles de religions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a religion autochtone | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ktunaxa | |
| 652 | |a AD:BB:KBQ:XA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d b |0 (DE-588)14216-5 |0 (DE-627)100430309 |0 (DE-576)190235675 |2 gnd |a Kanada |b Supreme Court |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4453740-2 |0 (DE-627)227603265 |0 (DE-576)212599178 |2 gnd |a Kutenai |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d g |0 (DE-588)4069670-4 |0 (DE-627)106102915 |0 (DE-576)209177470 |2 gnd |a British Columbia |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4125186-6 |0 (DE-627)105742090 |0 (DE-576)209574488 |2 gnd |a Religionsfreiheit |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4039411-6 |0 (DE-627)106228110 |0 (DE-576)209034912 |2 gnd |a Minderheitenrecht |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studies in religion |d London : Sage, 1971 |g 49(2020), 1, Seite 32-49 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)617810826 |w (DE-600)2535808-X |w (DE-576)318518368 |x 2042-0587 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:49 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:32-49 |
| 856 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0008429819854357 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0008429819854357 |x Resolving-System |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| CAN | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 360751979X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1692423460 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201002113106 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200313||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-04-08#1BBFEBCCD6AA4576EC273F2CE60936B4DFF0062A | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442049227 |a KBQ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043342 |a BB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053798 |a XA | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a British Columbia,Minority rights,Minority protection,Ethnic group rights,Nationality rights,Minorities,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature,Religious freedom,Freedom of religion,Religious liberty |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Droit des minorités,Liberté religieuse,Religion,Religions,Religion |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Derecho de las minorías,Libertad de religión,Religión,Religión,Religión |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Diritto delle minoranze,Libertà di religione,Religione,Religione,Religione |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,宗教自由,信教自由,少数人权利 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教,宗教,宗教自由,信教自由,少數人權利 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Direito das minorias,Liberdade de religião,Religião,Religião |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Права меньшинств,Религия (мотив),Религия,Свобода вероисповедания |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Δίκαιο των μειονοτήτων,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Θρησκευτική ελευθερία |
| SUB | |a CAN |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Supreme Court,Cour Suprême,Kanada,Cour Suprême,Kanada,Verfassungsgericht,Supreme Court of Canada,Cour Suprême du Canada , Cootenay,Flatbow,Kootenai,Arc-a-plat,Ktunaxa , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Britisch-Kolumbien,Colombie-Britannique,Colombie Britannique,Columbia Británica,BC,Province of British Columbia , Religiöse Freiheit , Minderheitenschutz,Minderheit,Minderheitenrecht,Volksgruppenrecht,Nationalitätenrecht |