Is Scripture the origin of the Halakhah?

Scripture, in particular the Pentateuch, forms the natural starting point for any inquiry into origins in Judaism. The question answered here derives from a simple fact: the Pentateuch is privileged within the Rabbinic system, which links as much of the Halakhah to the Pentateuchal law codes as it p...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Neusner, Jacob 1932-2016 (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Digitale/Stampa Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: 2009
In: Religion
Anno: 2009, Volume: 39, Fascicolo: 1, Pagine: 58-68
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Bible. Pentateuch, Bibel. Pentateuch / Halakhah
B Ebraismo / Esegesi
Notazioni IxTheo:BH Ebraismo
HB Antico Testamento
Altre parole chiave:B Halakhah
B Torah
Accesso online: Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:Scripture, in particular the Pentateuch, forms the natural starting point for any inquiry into origins in Judaism. The question answered here derives from a simple fact: the Pentateuch is privileged within the Rabbinic system, which links as much of the Halakhah to the Pentateuchal law codes as it possibly can. So it is quite natural to treat Scripture as the base-line and the Halakhic category-formations as the variable, in seeking the origin of the system. But what happens when we treat the system as the base-line and Scripture as the variable? Then we see that the Halakhic system viewed as a coherent statement does not originate in Scripture. Scripture is not the origin of the Halakhah. Why not? Because of this paradox: Scripture is necessary for the Halakhic system. But Scripture is insufficient for the Halakhic system. The Halakhic system is necessary for Scripture. The Halakhic system is sufficient without Scripture. It requires only Scripture's facts - and these on their own form no system.
ISSN:0048-721X
Comprende:In: Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1016/j.religion.2008.03.001